Omniscient Versus Third Person Limited POV

Which is the Best Viewpoint for a Novel

© Marg McAlister

Oct 4, 2009
Think of Omniscient Viewpoint as a Camera Lens, Clipart.com Photo
Countless writers are confused about how to use viewpoint, which can have disastrous results. Learn what POV is all about, and how to avoid months of wasted effort.

It sometimes helps to think of viewpoint as a kind of camera, with the author using the viewfinder and zoom functions. How the author handles this 'viewpoint camera' determines how the reader will see the story and characters.

Think about the range of cameras that are available today. Google Earth uses satellite view and can zoom in from hundreds of miles out to a close-up view in streetscape. At the other end of the spectrum, developing technology has given the world tiny cameras on the end of probes that can send back pictures from inside the human body. (This might be getting closer to first-person point of view: knowing what is going on inside only one person's body and mind for the whole book.)

Omniscient Point of View

Omniscient viewpoint is not tied to one character. Like Google Earth's satellite view, the author can pan across a vast landscape, seeing all and knowing all (and reporting it all to the reader). It's then possible to zoom in; first on one person, then on another. But 'viewpoint cameras' have one advantage over normal cameras: they can also tap into any character's thoughts. (Now that's something that technology has not yet mastered: a camera with ESP.)

There are drawbacks to using omniscient viewpoint. Firstly, readers can become dizzy because of constant movement from one character's viewpoint to another's. They lose track of whose head they are supposed to be in. They never really identify closely with any one character. The minute they start to get comfortable looking out through one character's eyes and feeling that person's emotions, they're rudely yanked out and sent into someone else's head. In addition, knowing what everyone is thinking can destroy tension and suspense.

Third Person Limited Point of View

The limited third person narrator experiences the whole story, scene by scene, through the eyes of one character at a time. This does not mean that the story must be told only by one person. It is quite okay to switch to another character's viewpoint occasionally, but there should be only one viewpoint character in each scene. (In omniscient viewpoint, the viewpoint could change a dozen times in one scene or the author could show what a whole group of people is feeling or thinking.)

Points to remember About Using Third Person Limited Viewpoint

  • The viewpoint character can see, hear and feel only what he experiences directly. He can only guess at what other characters are thinking he doesn't know for sure.
  • Never switch viewpoint in the middle of a scene.
  • There must be a clear break between one viewpoint character and the next -- a line break (between scenes) or a chapter break.
  • If more than one viewpoint character is used in the story, the author must make it clear whose viewpoint is being used as close to the beginning of the scene as possible.

Third person limited point of view (or POV) is a good choice for most writers. It enables writers to build suspense by showing what different characters feel and think, while allowing readers to identify closely with the Main viewpoint character. Those new to plotting and writing a book will find that the whole process becomes much easier once they have decided how to handle viewpoint.


The copyright of the article Omniscient Versus Third Person Limited POV in Writing Techniques is owned by Marg McAlister. Permission to republish Omniscient Versus Third Person Limited POV in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Think of Omniscient Viewpoint as a Camera Lens, Clipart.com Photo
Omniscient Viewpoint Taps into All Characters, Clipart.com Photo
Third Person Limited POV is One Head at a Time, Clipart.com Photo
Use One Viewpoint for Each Scene, Clipart.com Photo
 


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Oct 4, 2009 5:45 AM
Garridon :
I would have liked to also see the pluses of using omniscient--this comes across a little like "Don't use it--here are the reasons why." Those reasons are valid for some types of stories, but not for every story. When I picked omniscient for mine, I stopped and considered why I should use it over the other POVs. I'd actually tried 50-100 pages in the other two, and it wasn't working. First was particularly horrible--and the reason because it was TOO personal. The story itself needed me to step back with the distance so the humor could work better. I also needed the overall narrator to show scenes that came across as far too one-sided in the main character's POV, whereas it needed more balance. I also have a hugely complicated backstory which the main character knows all of it--much easier to keep details from the reader in omni. In the other viewpoints, it wcame across as keeping things from the reader. I also have a large cast (25+ characters), including four main characters who are together most of the book. Omniscient gives me better control of dealing with the large cast. Omni also helped with my fight scenes, which have the four main characters in them, plus the bad guys. In third, I'd either have to violate POV or do lots of annoying scene cutting. Omni gives me a chances to show the entire fight. There are lots of great benefits for the right type of story.
1 Comment: